Nutrient Comparison: Baked Potato Flesh VS Teff per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh versus 100 g of Teff to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh vs Teff:
- 100 g of Raw Teff contain 3.7 times more Vitamin B1, 12.9 times more Vitamin B2, 2.4 times more Vitamin B3, 1.7 times more Vitamin B5 and 1.6 times more Vitamin B6 than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Raw Teff have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin E and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Baked Potato Flesh vs Teff:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 8.6 times more Water than Teff.
- While 100 g of Raw Teff contain 36 times more Calcium, 3.8 times more Copper, 21.8 times more Iron, 7.4 times more Magnesium, 57.4 times more Manganese, 8.6 times more Phosphorus, 14.7 times more Selenium and 12.5 times more Zinc than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Teff contain similar levels of Potassium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Raw Teff contain 3.9 times more Energy, 23.8 times more Fat, 13.5 times more Omega 3, 29.3 times more Omega 6, 3.4 times more Carbohydrate, 5.3 times more Fiber and 6.8 times more Protein than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Teff offer comparable quantities of Sugars per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6