Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Quinoa VS Potato Skin per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Quinoa versus 100 g of Potato Skin to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Quinoa vs Potato Skin:
- 100 grams of Cooked Quinoa have 5.1 times more Vitamin B1, 2.9 times more Vitamin B2 and 2.5 times more Vitamin B9 than Potato Skin.
- While 100 g of Raw Potato Skin contain 2.5 times more Vitamin B3, 1.9 times more Vitamin B6 and more Vitamin C than Cooked Quinoa.
- 100 grams of Cooked Quinoa have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Potato Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1
- Both Cooked Quinoa as well as Raw Potato Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Quinoa vs Potato Skin:
- 100 grams of Cooked Quinoa have 2.8 times more Magnesium, 4 times more Phosphorus, 9.3 times more Selenium and 3.1 times more Zinc than Potato Skin.
- While 100 g of Raw Potato Skin contain 1.8 times more Calcium, 2.2 times more Copper, 2.2 times more Iron and 2.4 times more Potassium than Cooked Quinoa.
- Both Cooked Quinoa and Potato Skin contain similar levels of Manganese per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Quinoa lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- 100 grams of Potato Skin lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cooked Quinoa have 2.1 times more Energy, 8.5 times more Omega 3, 30.4 times more Omega 6, 1.7 times more Carbohydrate and 1.7 times more Protein than Potato Skin.
- Both Cooked Quinoa and Potato Skin offer comparable quantities of Fiber per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Potato Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6