Nutrient Comparison: Snacks, taro chips VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Snacks, taro chips versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Snacks, taro chips vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Snacks, taro chips have 2 times more Vitamin B1, 6.2 times more Vitamin B5, 5 times more Vitamin B6, 59.7 times more Vitamin E and 9.5 times more Vitamin K than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.7 times more Vitamin B2, 1.7 times more Vitamin B3, 1.4 times more Vitamin B9 and 4.1 times more Vitamin C than Snacks, taro chips.
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E and Vitamin K
- Both Snacks, taro chips as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Snacks, taro chips vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Snacks, taro chips have 3.8 times more Calcium, 2.8 times more Copper, 4.4 times more Iron, 4 times more Magnesium, 4.9 times more Phosphorus, 2.8 times more Potassium, 2.6 times more Selenium and 24.4 times more Sodium than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 384 times more Manganese than Snacks, taro chips.
- Both Snacks, taro chips and Cassava contain similar levels of Zinc per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Snacks, taro chips lack sufficient amounts of Manganese
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Snacks, taro chips have 3.1 times more Energy, 88.9 times more Fat, 86.9 times more Saturated Fat, 3.5 times more Omega 3, 400.6 times more Omega 6, 1.8 times more Carbohydrate, 2.2 times more Sugars, 4 times more Fiber and 1.7 times more Protein than Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6