Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Taro VS Red Kidney Beans per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Taro versus 100 g of Red Kidney Beans to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Taro vs Red Kidney Beans:
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro have 14 times more Vitamin E than Red Kidney Beans.
- While 100 g of Raw Red Kidney Beans contain 5.7 times more Vitamin B1, 7.7 times more Vitamin B2, 4.1 times more Vitamin B3, 2.3 times more Vitamin B5, 20.7 times more Vitamin B9 and 4.7 times more Vitamin K than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Taro and Red Kidney Beans provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 and Vitamin C per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
- 100 grams of Red Kidney Beans have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
- Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Raw Red Kidney Beans have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Taro vs Red Kidney Beans:
- 100 g of Raw Red Kidney Beans contain 4.6 times more Calcium, 3.5 times more Copper, 9.3 times more Iron, 4.6 times more Magnesium, 2.5 times more Manganese, 5.3 times more Phosphorus, 2.8 times more Potassium, 3.6 times more Selenium and 10.3 times more Zinc than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Raw Red Kidney Beans contain 2.4 times more Energy, 25.6 times more Omega 3, 1.8 times more Carbohydrate, 4.3 times more Sugars, 3 times more Fiber and 43.3 times more Protein than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Protein
- Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Raw Red Kidney Beans provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 100 grams.