Nutrient Comparison: Whole Triticale Flour VS Potato Skin per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Whole Triticale Flour versus 100 g of Potato Skin to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Whole Triticale Flour vs Potato Skin:
- 100 grams of Whole Triticale Flour have 18 times more Vitamin B1, 3.5 times more Vitamin B2, 2.8 times more Vitamin B3, 7.2 times more Vitamin B5, 1.7 times more Vitamin B6 and 4.4 times more Vitamin B9 than Potato Skin.
- While 100 g of Raw Potato Skin contain more Vitamin C than Whole-grain Triticale Flour.
- 100 grams of Whole Triticale Flour have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Potato Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1
- Both Whole-grain Triticale Flour as well as Raw Potato Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Whole Triticale Flour vs Potato Skin:
- 100 grams of Whole Triticale Flour have 1.3 times more Copper, 6.7 times more Magnesium, 7 times more Manganese, 8.4 times more Phosphorus and 7.6 times more Zinc than Potato Skin.
- While 100 g of Raw Potato Skin contain 1.3 times more Iron and 8.3 times more Water than Whole-grain Triticale Flour.
- Both Whole Triticale Flour and Potato Skin contain similar levels of Calcium and Potassium per 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Whole Triticale Flour have 5.8 times more Energy, 5.3 times more Omega 3, 23.2 times more Omega 6, 5.9 times more Carbohydrate, 5.8 times more Fiber and 5.1 times more Protein than Potato Skin.
- 100 grams of Potato Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6