Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Taro VS Dried Beechnuts per 14 oz
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 14 oz of Cooked Taro versus 14 oz of Dried Beechnuts to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 14 ounces of Cooked Taro vs Dried Beechnuts:
- 14 oz of Dried Beechnuts contain 2.8 times more Vitamin B1, 13.3 times more Vitamin B2, 1.7 times more Vitamin B3, 2.8 times more Vitamin B5, 2.1 times more Vitamin B6, 5.9 times more Vitamin B9 and 3.1 times more Vitamin C than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Dried Beechnuts have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B12 in 14 ounces.
Comparing minerals per 14 ounces for Cooked Taro vs Dried Beechnuts:
- 14 ounces of Cooked Taro have more Magnesium and more Phosphorus than Dried Beechnuts.
- While 14 oz of Dried Beechnuts contain 3.3 times more Copper, 3.4 times more Iron, 3 times more Manganese, 2.1 times more Potassium, 2.5 times more Sodium and 1.3 times more Zinc than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- 14 ounces of Dried Beechnuts lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium and Phosphorus
- Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Dried Beechnuts lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 14 ounces.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 14 ounces:
- 14 oz of Dried Beechnuts contain 4.1 times more Energy, 454.5 times more Fat, 248.7 times more Saturated Fat, 121.4 times more Omega 3, 574.7 times more Omega 6 and 11.9 times more Protein than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Taro and Dried Beechnuts offer comparable quantities of Carbohydrate per 14 ounces.
- 14 ounces of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Omega 6 and Protein