Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Chickpea flourVS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin
Weight per 300 calories
Chickpea flour
77.5g
Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin
345g
Chickpea flour has 4.4 times more energy per 100g than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin. It has high energy density when compared to other foods. Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chickpea flour or Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin?
Chickpea Flour VS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chickpea flour or Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Chickpea flour vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
300 calories of Chickpea flour have 9.8 times more Vitamin B9 than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 3.6 times more Vitamin B3, 3.8 times more Vitamin B5, 2.7 times more Vitamin B6 and more Vitamin C than Chickpea flour.
Both Chickpea flour and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chickpea flour have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C and Vitamin K
300 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
Both Chickpea flour as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin E in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Chickpea flour vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
300 calories of Chickpea flour have 3.5 times more Iron, 1.7 times more Magnesium, 2.6 times more Manganese, 1.6 times more Phosphorus, 6.2 times more Selenium and 2.1 times more Zinc than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 2 times more Potassium and 33.3 times more Water than Chickpea flour.
Both Chickpea flour and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin contain similar levels of Copper per 300 calories.
300 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
Both Chickpea flour as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Chickpea flour have 20.2 times more Omega 6, 2.7 times more Sugars, 1.3 times more Fiber and 2.7 times more Protein than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 1.5 times more Carbohydrate than Chickpea flour.
Both Chickpea flour and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
Both Chickpea flour as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 300 calories.