Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Canned Chickpeas VS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin
Weight per 300 calories
Canned Chickpeas
216g
Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin
345g
Canned Chickpeas have 1.6 times more energy per 100g than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Canned Chickpeas or Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin?
Canned Chickpeas VS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Canned Chickpeas or Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Canned Chickpeas vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
300 calories of Canned Chickpeas have 3 times more Vitamin B9 than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 6.3 times more Vitamin B1, 16.4 times more Vitamin B3, 4.1 times more Vitamin B6 and 207.7 times more Vitamin C than Canned Chickpeas , Solids.
Both Canned Chickpeas and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin provide similar amounts of Vitamin K per 300 calories.
300 calories of Canned Chickpeas have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3 and Vitamin C
Both Canned Chickpeas , Solids as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin E in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Canned Chickpeas vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
300 calories of Canned Chickpeas have 5.6 times more Calcium, 2.2 times more Iron, 3.8 times more Manganese, 1.2 times more Phosphorus, 6.5 times more Selenium, 38.5 times more Sodium and 1.3 times more Zinc than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 1.4 times more Magnesium, 4.8 times more Potassium and 1.8 times more Water than Canned Chickpeas , Solids.
Both Canned Chickpeas and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin contain similar levels of Copper per 300 calories.
300 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Canned Chickpeas have 17.3 times more Fat, 18.2 times more Omega 6, 2.8 times more Sugars, 2.2 times more Fiber and 2.4 times more Protein than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 1.4 times more Carbohydrate than Canned Chickpeas , Solids.
Both Canned Chickpeas and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
Both Canned Chickpeas , Solids as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 300 calories.