Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories AcornsVS Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids
Weight per 300 calories
Acorns
77.5g
Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids
600g
Acorns have 7.7 times more energy per 100g than Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids. It has high energy density when compared to other foods. Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Acorns or Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids?
Acorns VS Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts With Liquids Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Acorns or Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Acorns vs Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids:
300 calories of Acorns have 1.3 times more Vitamin B1 and 1.9 times more Vitamin B9 than Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids.
While 300 kcal of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids contain 1.6 times more Vitamin B2, 1.5 times more Vitamin B3, 2.4 times more Vitamin B5, 2.3 times more Vitamin B6 and more Vitamin C than Raw Acorns.
300 calories of Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
300 calories of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1
Both Raw Acorns as well as Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B12 in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Acorns vs Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids:
300 calories of Acorns have 1.6 times more Magnesium than Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids.
While 300 kcal of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids contain 8.5 times more Iron, 1.9 times more Phosphorus, 1.7 times more Potassium, 5.8 times more Zinc and 24 times more Water than Raw Acorns.
Both Acorns and Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids contain similar levels of Copper and Manganese per 300 calories.
300 calories of Acorns lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Both Raw Acorns as well as Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Acorns have 51.4 times more Fat, 25 times more Saturated Fat and 31.3 times more Omega 6 than Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids.
While 300 kcal of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids contain 2.3 times more Carbohydrate than Raw Acorns.
Both Acorns and Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids offer comparable quantities of Energy and Protein per 300 calories.
300 calories of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6