Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Oranges with Peel VS Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat
Weight per 300 calories
Oranges with Peel
476g
Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat
61.6g
Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat have 7.7 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Oranges with Peel , which is very high in comparison to other foods. Oranges with Peel having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Oranges with Peel or Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat?
Oranges With Peel VS Potato Chips, Without Salt, Reduced Fat Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Oranges with Peel or Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Oranges with Peel vs Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat:
300 calories of Oranges with Peel have more Vitamin A, 3.7 times more Vitamin B1, 1.4 times more Vitamin B2, 23.2 times more Vitamin B9 and 21.4 times more Vitamin C than Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat.
While 300 kcal of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat contain 1.8 times more Vitamin B3 than Raw Oranges with Peel .
Both Oranges with Peel and Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B9
Both Raw Oranges with Peel as well as Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Oranges with Peel vs Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat:
300 calories of Oranges with Peel have 25.8 times more Calcium, 1.3 times more Copper, 4.6 times more Iron, 1.2 times more Magnesium and 636.2 times more Water than Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat.
While 300 kcal of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat contain 1.5 times more Selenium than Raw Oranges with Peel .
Both Oranges with Peel and Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat contain similar levels of Phosphorus and Potassium per 300 calories.
300 calories of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Both Raw Oranges with Peel as well as Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat lack sufficient amounts of Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Oranges with Peel have 1.8 times more Carbohydrate, 5.7 times more Fiber and 1.4 times more Protein than Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat.
While 300 kcal of Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat contain 9 times more Fat, 15.4 times more Saturated Fat, 1.5 times more Omega 3 and 31.6 times more Omega 6 than Raw Oranges with Peel .
Both Oranges with Peel and Potato chips, without salt, reduced fat offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Oranges with Peel provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6