Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with SaltVS Bartlett Pears
Weight per 300 calories
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt
206g
Bartlett Pears
476g
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt have 2.3 times more energy per 100g than Bartlett Pears. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Bartlett Pears having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt or Bartlett Pears?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt
Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes With Salt VS Bartlett Pears Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt or Bartlett Pears?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt vs Bartlett Pears:
300 calories of Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt have 3.8 times more Vitamin B1, 5.6 times more Vitamin B3, 4.6 times more Vitamin B5, 3.3 times more Vitamin B6 and 2.2 times more Vitamin B9 than Bartlett Pears.
While 300 kcal of Raw Bartlett Pears contain 1.6 times more Vitamin B2, 1.3 times more Vitamin C and 4.2 times more Vitamin K than Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt.
300 calories of Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin K
300 calories of Bartlett Pears have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3 and Vitamin B5
Both Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt as well as Raw Bartlett Pears have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin E in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt vs Bartlett Pears:
300 calories of Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt have 1.4 times more Iron, 1.5 times more Magnesium, 1.8 times more Manganese, 3.2 times more Phosphorus, 1.6 times more Potassium, 150.6 times more Sodium and 1.8 times more Zinc than Bartlett Pears.
While 300 kcal of Raw Bartlett Pears contain 2.3 times more Copper and 2.9 times more Water than Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt.
300 calories of Bartlett Pears lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Both Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt as well as Raw Bartlett Pears lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt have 13.5 times more Fat and 2.6 times more Protein than Bartlett Pears.
While 300 kcal of Raw Bartlett Pears contain 1.5 times more Carbohydrate, 106.9 times more Sugars, more Fructose and 3.6 times more Fiber than Frozen Crinkle or Regular Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt.
Both Frozen Crinkle Cut French Fried Potatoes with Salt and Bartlett Pears offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Bartlett Pears provide inadequate amounts of Protein