Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken TofuVS Broccoli Raab
Weight per 300 calories
Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu
698g
Broccoli Raab
1364g
Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu has 2 times more energy per 100g than Broccoli Raab. It has low energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Broccoli Raab having very low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu or Broccoli Raab?
Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu VS Broccoli Raab Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu or Broccoli Raab?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu vs Broccoli Raab:
300 calories of Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu have more Vitamin B12, more Vitamin D and 1.7 times more Vitamin E than Broccoli Raab.
While 300 kcal of Raw Broccoli Raab contain 2.7 times more Vitamin A than Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu.
300 calories of Broccoli Raab have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu vs Broccoli Raab:
300 calories of Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu have 1.9 times more Calcium, 1.4 times more Phosphorus and 1.2 times more Sodium than Broccoli Raab.
While 300 kcal of Raw Broccoli Raab contain 4.8 times more Iron and 2 times more Water than Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu have 1.3 times more Protein than Broccoli Raab.
While 300 kcal of Raw Broccoli Raab contain more Carbohydrate than Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu.
Both Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu and Broccoli Raab offer comparable quantities of Energy and Fat per 300 calories.
300 calories of Vitasoy USA Nasoya, Lite Silken Tofu provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate