Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with LiquidsVS Acorns
Weight per 300 calories
Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids
600g
Acorns
77.5g
Raw Acorns have 7.7 times more energy per unit of mass than Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids, which is high in comparison to other foods. Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids or Acorns?
Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts With Liquids VS Acorns Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids or Acorns?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids vs Acorns:
300 calories of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids have 1.6 times more Vitamin B2, 1.5 times more Vitamin B3, 2.4 times more Vitamin B5, 2.3 times more Vitamin B6 and more Vitamin C than Acorns.
While 300 kcal of Raw Acorns contain 1.3 times more Vitamin B1 and 1.9 times more Vitamin B9 than Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids.
300 calories of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1
300 calories of Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
Both Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids as well as Raw Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B12 in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids vs Acorns:
300 calories of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids have 1.2 times more Copper, 8.5 times more Iron, 1.9 times more Phosphorus, 1.7 times more Potassium, 5.8 times more Zinc and 24 times more Water than Acorns.
While 300 kcal of Raw Acorns contain 1.6 times more Magnesium than Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids.
Both Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids and Acorns contain similar levels of Manganese per 300 calories.
300 calories of Acorns lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Both Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids as well as Raw Acorns lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids have 2.3 times more Carbohydrate than Acorns.
While 300 kcal of Raw Acorns contain 51.4 times more Fat, 25 times more Saturated Fat and 31.3 times more Omega 6 than Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts Solids and Liquids.
Both Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids and Acorns offer comparable quantities of Energy and Protein per 300 calories.
300 calories of Canned Chinese Waterchestnuts with Liquids provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6