Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Sweet Cherries per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Sweet Cherries to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Sweet Cherries:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 3.2 times more Vitamin B1, 1.5 times more Vitamin B2, 5.5 times more Vitamin B3, 1.8 times more Vitamin B6, 6.8 times more Vitamin B9 and 2.9 times more Vitamin C than Sweet Cherries.
- While 100 g of Raw Sweet Cherries contain 1.9 times more Vitamin B5 than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Sweet Cherries have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B3 and Vitamin B9
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Sweet Cherries have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Vitamin E and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Sweet Cherries:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.7 times more Copper, 1.9 times more Magnesium, 5.5 times more Manganese, 1.3 times more Phosphorus, 1.2 times more Potassium and 4.9 times more Zinc than Sweet Cherries.
- While 100 g of Raw Sweet Cherries contain 1.3 times more Iron and 1.4 times more Water than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Sweet Cherries lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Sweet Cherries lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 2.5 times more Energy, 2.4 times more Carbohydrate and 1.3 times more Protein than Sweet Cherries.
- While 100 g of Raw Sweet Cherries contain 7.5 times more Sugars than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Sweet Cherries offer comparable quantities of Fiber per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Sweet Cherries provide inadequate amounts of Protein
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Sweet Cherries provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.