Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Sugars, maple per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Sugars, maple to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Sugars, maple:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 9.7 times more Vitamin B1, 3.7 times more Vitamin B2, 21.4 times more Vitamin B3, 2.2 times more Vitamin B5, 29.3 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Sugars, maple.
- 100 grams of Sugars, maple have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Sugars, maple have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Vitamin E and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Sugars, maple:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 9 times more Phosphorus than Sugars, maple.
- While 100 g of Sugars, maple contain 5.6 times more Calcium, 6 times more Iron, 11.5 times more Manganese and 17.8 times more Zinc than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Sugars, maple contain similar levels of Copper, Magnesium and Potassium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- 100 grams of Sugars, maple lack sufficient amounts of Phosphorus
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Sugars, maple lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have more Fiber and 13.6 times more Protein than Sugars, maple.
- While 100 g of Sugars, maple contain 2.2 times more Energy, 2.4 times more Carbohydrate and 49.9 times more Sugars than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Sugars, maple provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Sugars, maple provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.