Nutrient Comparison: Acorns VS Composite Household Vegetable Shortening per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Acorns versus 100 g of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Acorns vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
- 100 grams of Acorns have 5.6 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 528 times more Vitamin B6 and more Vitamin B9 than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- Both Acorns and Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide similar amounts of Vitamin B5 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B6 and Vitamin B9
- Both Raw Acorns as well as Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin C in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Acorns vs Composite Household Vegetable Shortening:
- 100 grams of Acorns have 41 times more Calcium, more Copper, 11.3 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium and more Zinc than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Acorns have more Carbohydrate and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- While 100 g of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening contain 2.3 times more Energy, 4.2 times more Fat, 8.1 times more Saturated Fat and 5.7 times more Omega 6 than Raw Acorns.
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate and Protein