Nutrient Comparison: Baked Potato Flesh VS Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh versus 100 g of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh vs Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have more Vitamin C than Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix.
- 100 grams of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Baked Potato Flesh vs Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have more Potassium and 20.2 times more Water than Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix.
- While 100 g of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix contain 20 times more Calcium, 5.1 times more Iron and 170 times more Sodium than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- 100 grams of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix lack sufficient amounts of Potassium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Cocoa mix, NESTLE, Rich Chocolate Hot Cocoa Mix contain 4.3 times more Energy, 150 times more Fat, 384.6 times more Saturated Fat, 3.5 times more Carbohydrate, 35.3 times more Sugars, 2.7 times more Fiber and 1.5 times more Protein than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.