Nutrient Comparison: Baked Potato Flesh VS Canned Coconut Milk per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh versus 100 g of Canned Coconut Milk to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh vs Canned Coconut Milk:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 4.8 times more Vitamin B1, 2.2 times more Vitamin B3, 3.6 times more Vitamin B5, 10.8 times more Vitamin B6 and 12.8 times more Vitamin C than Canned Coconut Milk.
- While 100 g of Canned Coconut Milk contain 1.6 times more Vitamin B9 than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- 100 grams of Canned Coconut Milk have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin C
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Canned Coconut Milk have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Baked Potato Flesh vs Canned Coconut Milk:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 1.8 times more Potassium than Canned Coconut Milk.
- While 100 g of Canned Coconut Milk contain 9.4 times more Iron, 1.8 times more Magnesium, 4.8 times more Manganese, 1.9 times more Phosphorus and 1.9 times more Zinc than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Canned Coconut Milk contain similar levels of Copper per 100 grams.
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Canned Coconut Milk lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have 7.7 times more Carbohydrate than Canned Coconut Milk.
- While 100 g of Canned Coconut Milk contain 2.1 times more Energy, 213.3 times more Fat and 727.5 times more Saturated Fat than Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt.
- Both Baked Potato Flesh and Canned Coconut Milk offer comparable quantities of Protein per 100 grams.
- Both Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt as well as Canned Coconut Milk provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 100 grams.