Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Spelt VS Baked Potato Flesh per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Spelt versus 100 g of Baked Potato Flesh to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Spelt vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Cooked Spelt have 1.4 times more Vitamin B2, 1.8 times more Vitamin B3 and 1.4 times more Vitamin B9 than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 3.8 times more Vitamin B6 and more Vitamin C than Cooked Spelt.
- Both Cooked Spelt and Baked Potato Flesh provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Spelt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
- Both Cooked Spelt as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin E in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Spelt vs Baked Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Cooked Spelt have 4.8 times more Iron, 2 times more Magnesium, 6.8 times more Manganese, 3 times more Phosphorus, 13.3 times more Selenium and 4.3 times more Zinc than Baked Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt contain 2.7 times more Potassium than Cooked Spelt.
- Both Cooked Spelt and Baked Potato Flesh contain similar levels of Copper per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Baked Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
- Both Cooked Spelt as well as Baked Potatoes Flesh no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cooked Spelt have 1.4 times more Energy, 1.2 times more Carbohydrate, 2.6 times more Fiber and 2.8 times more Protein than Baked Potato Flesh.