Nutrient Comparison: Sugars, maple VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Sugars, maple versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Sugars, maple vs Cassava:
- 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 9.7 times more Vitamin B1, 3.7 times more Vitamin B2, 21.4 times more Vitamin B3, 2.2 times more Vitamin B5, 29.3 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Sugars, maple.
- 100 grams of Sugars, maple have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
- Both Sugars, maple as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D, Vitamin E and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Sugars, maple vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Sugars, maple have 5.6 times more Calcium, 6 times more Iron, 11.5 times more Manganese and 17.8 times more Zinc than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 9 times more Phosphorus than Sugars, maple.
- Both Sugars, maple and Cassava contain similar levels of Copper, Magnesium and Potassium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Sugars, maple lack sufficient amounts of Phosphorus
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Sugars, maple as well as Raw Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Sugars, maple have 2.2 times more Energy, 2.4 times more Carbohydrate and 49.9 times more Sugars than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain more Fiber and 13.6 times more Protein than Sugars, maple.
- 100 grams of Sugars, maple provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein
- Both Sugars, maple as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.