Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories AlmondsVS Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Almonds
51.8g
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt
333g
Almonds have 6.4 times more energy per 100g than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Almonds or Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Almonds
14%
72%
14%
Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt
Almonds VS Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Almonds or Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Almonds vs Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt:
300 calories of Almonds have 1.7 times more Vitamin B2, 3.7 times more Vitamin B7 and 5.6 times more Vitamin E than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt contain more Vitamin A, 3.4 times more Vitamin B1, 2.6 times more Vitamin B3, 12.1 times more Vitamin B5, 13.4 times more Vitamin B6, more Vitamin C and more Vitamin K than Almonds.
300 calories of Almonds have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin C and Vitamin K
Both Almonds as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Almonds vs Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt:
300 calories of Almonds have 1.6 times more Magnesium, 1.4 times more Phosphorus and 1.5 times more Zinc than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt contain 1.5 times more Manganese, 4.2 times more Potassium, 1582.6 times more Sodium and 110.6 times more Water than Almonds.
Both Almonds and Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt contain similar levels of Calcium, Copper and Iron per 300 calories.
Both Almonds as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Almonds have 51.7 times more Fat, 11.4 times more Saturated Fat, 21.3 times more Omega 6 and 1.6 times more Protein than Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt contain 6.2 times more Carbohydrate, 9.6 times more Sugars and 1.7 times more Fiber than Almonds.
Both Almonds and Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6
Both Almonds as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Baked In Skin, Flesh with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 in 300 calories.