Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat have 9.6 times more energy per 100g than Navel Oranges. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Navel Oranges having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat or Navel Oranges?
Snacks, Potato Chips, Reduced Fat VS Navel Oranges Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat or Navel Oranges?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat vs Navel Oranges:
300 calories of Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat have 1.7 times more Vitamin B3, 3.8 times more Vitamin E and more Vitamin K than Navel Oranges.
While 300 kcal of Raw Navel Oranges contain more Vitamin A, 3.1 times more Vitamin B1, 1.8 times more Vitamin B2, 9.3 times more Vitamin B5, 12.1 times more Vitamin B9 and 22.1 times more Vitamin C than Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat.
Both Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat and Navel Oranges provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B5 and Vitamin B9
300 calories of Navel Oranges have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
Both Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat as well as Raw Navel Oranges have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat vs Navel Oranges:
300 calories of Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat have 1.6 times more Copper, 1.6 times more Manganese, more Selenium and 59.4 times more Sodium than Navel Oranges.
While 300 kcal of Raw Navel Oranges contain 19.7 times more Calcium and 826.4 times more Water than Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat.
Both Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat and Navel Oranges contain similar levels of Iron, Magnesium, Phosphorus and Potassium per 300 calories.
300 calories of Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
300 calories of Navel Oranges lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
Both Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat as well as Raw Navel Oranges lack sufficient amounts of Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat have 14.4 times more Fat, 25.5 times more Saturated Fat, 2.2 times more Omega 3 and 48.6 times more Omega 6 than Navel Oranges.
While 300 kcal of Raw Navel Oranges contain 1.8 times more Carbohydrate, 371.4 times more Sugars and 3.6 times more Fiber than Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat.
Both Snacks, potato chips, reduced fat and Navel Oranges offer comparable quantities of Energy and Protein per 300 calories.
300 calories of Navel Oranges provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6