Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Tomato PureeVS Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Tomato Puree
790g
Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
395g
Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt has 2 times more energy per unit of mass than Canned Tomato Puree, which is average in comparison to other foods. Tomato Puree having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Tomato Puree or Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Tomato Puree
15%
4%
81%
Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
Tomato Puree VS Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Tomato Puree or Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Tomato Puree vs Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt:
300 calories of Tomato Puree have 3.4 times more Vitamin B2, 5.4 times more Vitamin B3, 1.5 times more Vitamin B5, 1.5 times more Vitamin B6, 3.7 times more Vitamin B9, 1.7 times more Vitamin C, 4.2 times more Vitamin E and 3.2 times more Vitamin K than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt contain 15.1 times more Vitamin A than Canned Tomato Puree.
Both Tomato Puree and Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
Both Canned Tomato Puree as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Tomato Puree vs Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt:
300 calories of Tomato Puree have 1.3 times more Calcium, 6.1 times more Copper, 4.9 times more Iron, 2.6 times more Magnesium, 1.3 times more Manganese, 2.5 times more Phosphorus, 3.8 times more Potassium, 7 times more Selenium, 3.6 times more Zinc and 2.2 times more Water than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt contain 4.7 times more Sodium than Canned Tomato Puree.
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Tomato Puree have 1.7 times more Sugars, 11.1 times more Fructose, 1.5 times more Fiber and 2.4 times more Protein than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt.
Both Tomato Puree and Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.
Both Canned Tomato Puree as well as Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 300 calories.