Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Chinese WaterchestnutsVS Almond paste
Weight per 300 calories
Chinese Waterchestnuts
309g
Almond paste
65.5g
Almond paste has 4.7 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts, which is very high in comparison to other foods. Chinese Waterchestnuts having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chinese Waterchestnuts or Almond paste?
Chinese Waterchestnuts VS Almond Paste Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Chinese Waterchestnuts or Almond paste?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts vs Almond paste:
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 8.1 times more Vitamin B1, 2.3 times more Vitamin B2, 3.3 times more Vitamin B3, 20 times more Vitamin B5, 43 times more Vitamin B6 and 188.9 times more Vitamin C than Almond paste.
While 300 kcal of Almond paste contain 2.4 times more Vitamin E than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Almond paste provide similar amounts of Vitamin B9 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6 and Vitamin C
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Chinese Waterchestnuts vs Almond paste:
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 3.4 times more Copper, 1.8 times more Manganese, 8.8 times more Potassium, 1.6 times more Zinc and 24.6 times more Water than Almond paste.
While 300 kcal of Almond paste contain 3.3 times more Calcium, 5.6 times more Iron and 1.3 times more Magnesium than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Almond paste contain similar levels of Phosphorus per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Iron
Both Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts as well as Almond paste lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts have 2.4 times more Carbohydrate and 3 times more Fiber than Almond paste.
While 300 kcal of Almond paste contain 58.8 times more Fat, 4.2 times more Omega 3, 36.9 times more Omega 6, 1.6 times more Sugars and 1.4 times more Protein than Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts.
Both Chinese Waterchestnuts and Almond paste offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6