Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Figs per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Figs to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Figs:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.5 times more Vitamin B1, 2.1 times more Vitamin B3, 4.5 times more Vitamin B9 and 10.3 times more Vitamin C than Figs.
- While 100 g of Raw Figs contain 2.8 times more Vitamin B5, 1.3 times more Vitamin B6 and 2.5 times more Vitamin K than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Figs provide similar amounts of Vitamin B2 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
- 100 grams of Figs have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Figs have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin E in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Figs:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.4 times more Copper, 1.2 times more Magnesium, 3 times more Manganese, 1.9 times more Phosphorus and 2.3 times more Zinc than Figs.
- While 100 g of Raw Figs contain 2.2 times more Calcium, 1.4 times more Iron and 1.3 times more Water than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Figs contain similar levels of Potassium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- 100 grams of Figs lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Figs lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 2.2 times more Energy, 2 times more Carbohydrate and 1.8 times more Protein than Figs.
- While 100 g of Raw Figs contain 9.6 times more Sugars and 1.6 times more Fiber than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Figs provide inadequate amounts of Protein
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Raw Figs provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.