Nutrient Comparison: Cassava VS Whole Soft Wheat Flour per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cassava versus 100 g of Whole Soft Wheat Flour to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cassava vs Whole Soft Wheat Flour:
- 100 grams of Cassava have more Vitamin C than Whole Soft Wheat Flour.
- While 100 g of Soft Wheat Whole Grain Flour contain 3.4 times more Vitamin B1, 3.9 times more Vitamin B2, 6.3 times more Vitamin B3, 9.4 times more Vitamin B5, 2.2 times more Vitamin B6 and 2.8 times more Vitamin E than Raw Cassava.
- Both Cassava and Whole Soft Wheat Flour provide similar amounts of Vitamin B9 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
- 100 grams of Whole Soft Wheat Flour have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- Both Raw Cassava as well as Soft Wheat Whole Grain Flour have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cassava vs Whole Soft Wheat Flour:
- 100 g of Soft Wheat Whole Grain Flour contain 2.1 times more Calcium, 4.8 times more Copper, 13.7 times more Iron, 5.6 times more Magnesium, 8.9 times more Manganese, 12 times more Phosphorus, 1.5 times more Potassium, 18.1 times more Selenium and 8.7 times more Zinc than Raw Cassava.
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Cassava have 1.7 times more Sugars than Whole Soft Wheat Flour.
- While 100 g of Soft Wheat Whole Grain Flour contain 2.1 times more Energy, 7 times more Fat, 2 times more Carbohydrate, 7.3 times more Fiber and 7.1 times more Protein than Raw Cassava.