Nutrient Comparison: Almond paste VS Microwaved Potato Flesh per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Almond paste versus 100 g of Microwaved Potato Flesh to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Almond paste vs Microwaved Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Almond paste have 16.6 times more Vitamin B2 and 6.1 times more Vitamin B9 than Microwaved Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Microwaved Potato, Flesh Only no Salt contain 1.6 times more Vitamin B1, 5.3 times more Vitamin B5, 8.9 times more Vitamin B6 and 151 times more Vitamin C than Almond paste.
- Both Almond paste and Microwaved Potato Flesh provide similar amounts of Vitamin B3 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Microwaved Potato Flesh have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
- Both Almond paste as well as Microwaved Potato, Flesh Only no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Almond paste vs Microwaved Potato Flesh:
- 100 grams of Almond paste have 34.4 times more Calcium, 1.9 times more Copper, 3.9 times more Iron, 5.2 times more Magnesium, 5 times more Manganese, 2.4 times more Phosphorus, 10.5 times more Selenium and 4.5 times more Zinc than Microwaved Potato Flesh.
- While 100 g of Microwaved Potato, Flesh Only no Salt contain 1.3 times more Potassium than Almond paste.
- 100 grams of Microwaved Potato Flesh lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Almond paste have 4.6 times more Energy, 277.4 times more Fat, 101.1 times more Saturated Fat, 19.9 times more Omega 3, 174.3 times more Omega 6, 2.1 times more Carbohydrate, 3 times more Fiber and 4.3 times more Protein than Microwaved Potato Flesh.
- 100 grams of Microwaved Potato Flesh provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6