Nutrient Comparison: Almond paste VS Cooked Taro per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Almond paste versus 100 g of Cooked Taro to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Almond paste vs Cooked Taro:
- 100 grams of Almond paste have 14.8 times more Vitamin B2, 2.8 times more Vitamin B3, 3.8 times more Vitamin B9 and 4.6 times more Vitamin E than Cooked Taro.
- While 100 g of Cooked Taro no Salt contain 1.3 times more Vitamin B1, 3 times more Vitamin B5, 9.2 times more Vitamin B6 and 50 times more Vitamin C than Almond paste.
- 100 grams of Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- Both Almond paste as well as Cooked Taro no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Almond paste vs Cooked Taro:
- 100 grams of Almond paste have 9.6 times more Calcium, 2.3 times more Copper, 2.2 times more Iron, 4.3 times more Magnesium, 1.9 times more Manganese, 3.4 times more Phosphorus, 4.7 times more Selenium and 5.5 times more Zinc than Cooked Taro.
- While 100 g of Cooked Taro no Salt contain 1.5 times more Potassium than Almond paste.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Almond paste have 3.2 times more Energy, 252.2 times more Fat, 114.3 times more Saturated Fat, 14.2 times more Omega 3, 174.3 times more Omega 6, 1.4 times more Carbohydrate, 74 times more Sugars and 17.3 times more Protein than Cooked Taro.
- Both Almond paste and Cooked Taro offer comparable quantities of Fiber per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Omega 6 and Protein