Nutrient Comparison: Composite Household Vegetable Shortening VS Acorns per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening versus 100 g of Acorns to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Acorns:
- 100 g of Raw Acorns contain 5.6 times more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, 528 times more Vitamin B6 and more Vitamin B9 than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening and Acorns provide similar amounts of Vitamin B5 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B6 and Vitamin B9
- Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Raw Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin C in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Acorns:
- 100 g of Raw Acorns contain 41 times more Calcium, more Copper, 11.3 times more Iron, more Magnesium, more Manganese, more Phosphorus, more Potassium and more Zinc than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 2.3 times more Energy, 4.2 times more Fat, 8.1 times more Saturated Fat and 5.7 times more Omega 6 than Acorns.
- While 100 g of Raw Acorns contain more Carbohydrate and more Protein than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
- 100 grams of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate and Protein