Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Taro VS Acorns per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Taro versus 100 g of Acorns to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Taro vs Acorns:
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro have more Vitamin C than Acorns.
- While 100 g of Raw Acorns contain 4.2 times more Vitamin B2, 3.6 times more Vitamin B3, 2.1 times more Vitamin B5, 1.6 times more Vitamin B6 and 4.6 times more Vitamin B9 than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Taro and Acorns provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- Both Cooked Taro no Salt as well as Raw Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B12 in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Taro vs Acorns:
- 100 g of Raw Acorns contain 2.3 times more Calcium, 3.1 times more Copper, 2.1 times more Magnesium, 3 times more Manganese and 1.9 times more Zinc than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Taro and Acorns contain similar levels of Iron, Phosphorus and Potassium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Raw Acorns contain 2.7 times more Energy, 216.9 times more Fat, 134.9 times more Saturated Fat, 143.6 times more Omega 6 and 11.8 times more Protein than Cooked Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Taro and Acorns offer comparable quantities of Carbohydrate per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 and Protein