Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Tahitian Taro VS Acorns per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Cooked Tahitian Taro versus 100 g of Acorns to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Cooked Tahitian Taro vs Acorns:
- 100 grams of Cooked Tahitian Taro have 44 times more Vitamin A, 1.7 times more Vitamin B2 and more Vitamin C than Acorns.
- While 100 g of Raw Acorns contain 2.5 times more Vitamin B1, 3.8 times more Vitamin B3, 5.7 times more Vitamin B5, 4.5 times more Vitamin B6 and 12.4 times more Vitamin B9 than Cooked Tahitian Taro no Salt.
- 100 grams of Cooked Tahitian Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
- 100 grams of Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin C
- Both Cooked Tahitian Taro no Salt as well as Raw Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Cooked Tahitian Taro vs Acorns:
- 100 grams of Cooked Tahitian Taro have 3.6 times more Calcium, 2 times more Iron, more Sodium and 3.1 times more Water than Acorns.
- While 100 g of Raw Acorns contain 8.2 times more Copper, 8 times more Manganese and 5.1 times more Zinc than Cooked Tahitian Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Tahitian Taro and Acorns contain similar levels of Magnesium, Phosphorus and Potassium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Tahitian Taro lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Raw Acorns contain 8.8 times more Energy, 35.1 times more Fat, 22.3 times more Saturated Fat, 23.4 times more Omega 6, 5.9 times more Carbohydrate and 1.5 times more Protein than Cooked Tahitian Taro no Salt.
- 100 grams of Cooked Tahitian Taro provide inadequate amounts of Energy and Omega 6