Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Almond pasteVS Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing
Weight per 300 calories
Almond paste
65.5g
Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing
135g
Almond paste has 2.1 times more energy per 100g than Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing having above average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Almond paste or Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing?
Almond Paste VS Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Almond paste or Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Almond paste vs Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing:
300 calories of Almond paste have 3.9 times more Vitamin B2, 17.7 times more Vitamin B9 and 6.6 times more Vitamin E than Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing contain 99 times more Vitamin C and more Vitamin K than Almond paste.
300 calories of Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C and Vitamin K
300 calories of Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin B9
Both Almond paste as well as Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Almond paste vs Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing:
300 calories of Almond paste have 7.6 times more Calcium, 1.4 times more Copper, 7.9 times more Magnesium, 3.8 times more Manganese, 7.8 times more Phosphorus, 1.4 times more Potassium and 3.6 times more Zinc than Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing contain 192.1 times more Sodium than Almond paste.
Both Almond paste and Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing contain similar levels of Iron per 300 calories.
300 calories of Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium and Zinc
Both Almond paste as well as Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Almond paste have 1.6 times more Fiber and 7.5 times more Protein than Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing contain 9.3 times more Omega 3 and 1.3 times more Carbohydrate than Almond paste.
Both Almond paste and Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing offer comparable quantities of Energy, Fat, Omega 6 and Sugars per 300 calories.
300 calories of Reduced Fat French Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein