Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with SaltVS Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt
1000g
Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt
323g
Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt has 3.1 times more energy per unit of mass than Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt, which is average in comparison to other foods. Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt or Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt?
Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash With Salt VS Cooked Frozen Succotash With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt or Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt vs Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt:
300 calories of Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt have 62 times more Vitamin A, 1.8 times more Vitamin B1, 1.3 times more Vitamin B2, 4 times more Vitamin B5, 3.4 times more Vitamin B6, 3.4 times more Vitamin C and 2.1 times more Vitamin E than Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt contain 1.3 times more Vitamin B3 than Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt.
Both Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt and Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt provide similar amounts of Vitamin B9 and Vitamin K per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin E
Both Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt as well as Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt vs Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt:
300 calories of Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt have 2.1 times more Calcium, 2.4 times more Copper, 1.8 times more Magnesium, 1.4 times more Manganese, 2.5 times more Potassium, 2.7 times more Sodium and 3.8 times more Water than Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt contain 1.6 times more Phosphorus and 1.5 times more Zinc than Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt.
Both Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt and Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt contain similar levels of Iron per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Both Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt as well as Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt have 4.5 times more Omega 3, 4.1 times more Sugars and 2.2 times more Fiber than Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt contain 2 times more Omega 6 than Boiled and Drained Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt.
Both Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt and Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate and Protein per 300 calories.
300 calories of Boiled Hubbard Winter Squash with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6