Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Cooked Frozen Succotash with SaltVS Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt
323g
Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt
750g
Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt has 2.3 times more energy per 100g than Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt. It has average energy density when compared to other foods. Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt or Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt?
Cooked Frozen Succotash With Salt VS Baked Butternut Winter Squash With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt or Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt vs Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 1.7 times more Vitamin B2 than Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt contain 129.7 times more Vitamin A, 2.3 times more Vitamin B1, 1.7 times more Vitamin B3, 3.6 times more Vitamin B5, 3 times more Vitamin B6, 1.3 times more Vitamin B9, 6 times more Vitamin C and 16.7 times more Vitamin E than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt provide similar amounts of Vitamin K per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin E
Both Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt as well as Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt vs Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 1.5 times more Zinc than Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt contain 6.4 times more Calcium, 2.5 times more Copper, 1.6 times more Iron, 2.9 times more Magnesium, 1.4 times more Manganese, 2.5 times more Potassium, 1.9 times more Selenium, 2 times more Sodium and 2.8 times more Water than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt contain similar levels of Phosphorus per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt have 1.2 times more Omega 3, 11.1 times more Omega 6 and 2.1 times more Protein than Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt contain 2.1 times more Sugars and 1.8 times more Fiber than Boiled Frozen Succotash, drained with Salt.
Both Cooked Frozen Succotash with Salt and Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.
300 calories of Baked Butternut Winter Squash with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6