Nutrient Comparison: California Red Kidney Beans VS Succotash per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of California Red Kidney Beans versus 100 g of Succotash to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of California Red Kidney Beans vs Succotash:
- 100 grams of California Red Kidney Beans have 2.5 times more Vitamin B1, 2.7 times more Vitamin B2, 1.3 times more Vitamin B3, 6.1 times more Vitamin B5, 3.1 times more Vitamin B6 and 9.9 times more Vitamin B9 than Succotash.
- While 100 g of Raw Succotash contain 3.4 times more Vitamin C than Raw California Red Kidney Beans.
- Both Raw California Red Kidney Beans as well as Raw Succotash have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for California Red Kidney Beans vs Succotash:
- 100 grams of California Red Kidney Beans have 10.8 times more Calcium, 5.9 times more Copper, 5.1 times more Iron, 3.3 times more Magnesium, 1.5 times more Manganese, 3.6 times more Phosphorus, 4 times more Potassium, 5.3 times more Selenium and 4.2 times more Zinc than Succotash.
- 100 grams of Succotash lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Selenium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of California Red Kidney Beans have 3.3 times more Energy, 3.1 times more Carbohydrate, 6.6 times more Fiber and 4.8 times more Protein than Succotash.
- While 100 g of Raw Succotash contain 7.6 times more Omega 6 than Raw California Red Kidney Beans.
- Both California Red Kidney Beans and Succotash offer comparable quantities of Omega 3 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of California Red Kidney Beans provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6