Nutrient Comparison: Canned Butterbur VS Almond paste per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Canned Butterbur versus 100 g of Almond paste to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Canned Butterbur vs Almond paste:
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur have 119 times more Vitamin C than Almond paste.
- While 100 g of Almond paste contain 13.7 times more Vitamin B1, 69 times more Vitamin B2, 10.2 times more Vitamin B3, 10.3 times more Vitamin B5 and 24.3 times more Vitamin B9 than Canned Butterbur.
- Both Canned Butterbur and Almond paste provide similar amounts of Vitamin B6 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5 and Vitamin B9
- 100 grams of Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin C
- Both Canned Butterbur as well as Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Canned Butterbur vs Almond paste:
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur have 7 times more Water than Almond paste.
- While 100 g of Almond paste contain 5.1 times more Calcium, 12.3 times more Copper, 2.5 times more Iron, 65 times more Magnesium, 8.7 times more Manganese, 64.5 times more Phosphorus, 26.2 times more Potassium, 4.7 times more Selenium and 24.7 times more Zinc than Canned Butterbur.
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 g of Almond paste contain 152.7 times more Energy, 213.4 times more Fat, 125.8 times more Carbohydrate and 81.8 times more Protein than Canned Butterbur.
- 100 grams of Canned Butterbur provide inadequate amounts of Energy, Carbohydrate and Protein