Nutrient Comparison: Figs VS Cassava per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Figs versus 100 g of Cassava to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Figs vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Figs have 2.8 times more Vitamin B5, 1.3 times more Vitamin B6 and 2.5 times more Vitamin K than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.5 times more Vitamin B1, 2.1 times more Vitamin B3, 4.5 times more Vitamin B9 and 10.3 times more Vitamin C than Raw Figs.
- Both Figs and Cassava provide similar amounts of Vitamin B2 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Figs have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
- 100 grams of Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
- Both Raw Figs as well as Raw Cassava have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin E in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Figs vs Cassava:
- 100 grams of Figs have 2.2 times more Calcium, 1.4 times more Iron and 1.3 times more Water than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 1.4 times more Copper, 3 times more Manganese, 1.9 times more Phosphorus and 2.3 times more Zinc than Raw Figs.
- Both Figs and Cassava contain similar levels of Magnesium and Potassium per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Figs lack sufficient amounts of Zinc
- 100 grams of Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
- Both Raw Figs as well as Raw Cassava lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Figs have 9.6 times more Sugars and 1.6 times more Fiber than Cassava.
- While 100 g of Raw Cassava contain 2.2 times more Energy, 2 times more Carbohydrate and 1.8 times more Protein than Raw Figs.
- 100 grams of Figs provide inadequate amounts of Protein
- Both Raw Figs as well as Raw Cassava provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 100 grams.