Nutrient Comparison: Acorns VS Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Acorns versus 100 g of Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Acorns vs Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt:
- 100 grams of Acorns have 1.5 times more Vitamin B1, 2.5 times more Vitamin B2, 3.3 times more Vitamin B3, 1.6 times more Vitamin B5, 3.1 times more Vitamin B6 and 5.4 times more Vitamin B9 than Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt.
- While 100 g of Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt contain 167.5 times more Vitamin A and more Vitamin C than Raw Acorns.
- 100 grams of Acorns have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin C
- Both Raw Acorns as well as Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Acorns vs Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt:
- 100 grams of Acorns have 2.4 times more Calcium, 13.8 times more Copper, 1.7 times more Iron, 2.8 times more Magnesium, 7.9 times more Manganese, 3.4 times more Phosphorus, 1.5 times more Potassium and 3.4 times more Zinc than Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt.
- While 100 g of Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt contain more Sodium and 3.1 times more Water than Raw Acorns.
- 100 grams of Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Acorns have 7.7 times more Energy, 38.5 times more Fat, 24.2 times more Saturated Fat, 47.4 times more Omega 6, 3.8 times more Carbohydrate and 2.5 times more Protein than Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt.
- 100 grams of Winter Squash, Hubbard, Baked with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Energy and Omega 6