Nutrient Comparison: Almond paste VS Linoleic Safflower Oil per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Almond paste versus 100 g of Linoleic Safflower Oil to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Almond paste vs Linoleic Safflower Oil:
- 100 grams of Almond paste have more Vitamin B1, more Vitamin B2, more Vitamin B3, more Vitamin B5, more Vitamin B6 and more Vitamin B9 than Linoleic Safflower Oil.
- While 100 g of Linoleic Salad or Cooking Safflower Oil contain 2.5 times more Vitamin E and more Vitamin K than Almond paste.
- 100 grams of Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin K
- 100 grams of Linoleic Safflower Oil have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6 and Vitamin B9
- Both Almond paste as well as Linoleic Salad or Cooking Safflower Oil have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin C in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Almond paste vs Linoleic Safflower Oil:
- 100 grams of Almond paste have more Calcium, more Copper, more Iron, more Magnesium, more Phosphorus, more Potassium, more Selenium and more Zinc than Linoleic Safflower Oil.
- 100 grams of Linoleic Safflower Oil lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Almond paste have more Omega 3, more Carbohydrate, more Sugars, more Fiber and more Protein than Linoleic Safflower Oil.
- While 100 g of Linoleic Salad or Cooking Safflower Oil contain 1.9 times more Energy, 3.6 times more Fat, 2.4 times more Saturated Fat and 13.4 times more Omega 6 than Almond paste.
- 100 grams of Linoleic Safflower Oil provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Carbohydrate, Fiber and Protein