Nutrient Comparison: Dried Beechnuts VS Cooked Taro per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Dried Beechnuts versus 100 g of Cooked Taro to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Dried Beechnuts vs Cooked Taro:
- 100 grams of Dried Beechnuts have 2.8 times more Vitamin B1, 13.3 times more Vitamin B2, 1.7 times more Vitamin B3, 2.8 times more Vitamin B5, 2.1 times more Vitamin B6, 5.9 times more Vitamin B9 and 3.1 times more Vitamin C than Cooked Taro.
- Both Dried Beechnuts as well as Cooked Taro no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B12 in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Dried Beechnuts vs Cooked Taro:
- 100 grams of Dried Beechnuts have 3.3 times more Copper, 3.4 times more Iron, 3 times more Manganese, 2.1 times more Potassium, 2.5 times more Sodium and 1.3 times more Zinc than Cooked Taro.
- While 100 g of Cooked Taro no Salt contain more Magnesium and more Phosphorus than Dried Beechnuts.
- 100 grams of Dried Beechnuts lack sufficient amounts of Magnesium and Phosphorus
- Both Dried Beechnuts as well as Cooked Taro no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium in 100 grams.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Dried Beechnuts have 4.1 times more Energy, 454.5 times more Fat, 248.7 times more Saturated Fat, 121.4 times more Omega 3, 574.7 times more Omega 6 and 11.9 times more Protein than Cooked Taro.
- Both Dried Beechnuts and Cooked Taro offer comparable quantities of Carbohydrate per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3, Omega 6 and Protein