Nutrient Comparison: Frozen Coconut Milk VS Potato Skin per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Frozen Coconut Milk versus 100 g of Potato Skin to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Frozen Coconut Milk vs Potato Skin:
- 100 g of Raw Potato Skin contain more Vitamin B2, 1.5 times more Vitamin B3, 1.9 times more Vitamin B5, 8 times more Vitamin B6 and 10.4 times more Vitamin C than Frozen Coconut Milk.
- Both Frozen Coconut Milk and Potato Skin provide similar amounts of Vitamin B9 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Frozen Coconut Milk have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin C
- Both Frozen Coconut Milk as well as Raw Potato Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Frozen Coconut Milk vs Potato Skin:
- 100 grams of Frozen Coconut Milk have 1.4 times more Magnesium, 1.3 times more Manganese, 1.6 times more Phosphorus and 1.7 times more Zinc than Potato Skin.
- While 100 g of Raw Potato Skin contain 7.5 times more Calcium, 1.8 times more Copper, 4 times more Iron and 1.8 times more Potassium than Frozen Coconut Milk.
- 100 grams of Frozen Coconut Milk lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Frozen Coconut Milk have 3.5 times more Energy, 208 times more Fat and 709.4 times more Saturated Fat than Potato Skin.
- While 100 g of Raw Potato Skin contain 2.2 times more Carbohydrate and 1.6 times more Protein than Frozen Coconut Milk.
- Both Frozen Coconut Milk as well as Raw Potato Skin provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 100 grams.