Nutrient Comparison: Prunes VS Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin per 100 g
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 100 g of Prunes versus 100 g of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 100 grams of Prunes vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
- 100 grams of Prunes have more Vitamin A, 8.3 times more Vitamin B2, 2.1 times more Vitamin B3 and 2.5 times more Vitamin B6 than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
- While 100 g of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 5 times more Vitamin B9 and more Vitamin C than Raw Dehydrated Prunes.
- Both Prunes and Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B5 per 100 grams.
- 100 grams of Prunes have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9 and Vitamin C
- 100 grams of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin B2
- Both Raw Dehydrated Prunes as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 100 grams.
Comparing minerals per 100 grams for Prunes vs Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin:
- 100 grams of Prunes have 14.4 times more Calcium, 3.3 times more Copper, 11.4 times more Iron, 2.9 times more Magnesium, 2.3 times more Manganese, 2.5 times more Phosphorus, 2.8 times more Potassium and 2.5 times more Zinc than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
- While 100 g of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt contain 19.2 times more Water than Raw Dehydrated Prunes.
- 100 grams of Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 100 grams:
- 100 grams of Prunes have 3.9 times more Energy, 4.4 times more Carbohydrate and 2 times more Protein than Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin.
- Both Raw Dehydrated Prunes as well as Boiled Potato Flesh, Cooked In Skin without Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 6 in 100 grams.