Nutrient Comparison: Almond paste VS Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta per 1 lb
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 1 lb of Almond paste versus 1 lb of Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 1 pound of Almond paste vs Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta:
- 1 pound of Almond paste has 4 times more Vitamin B2, 3.7 times more Vitamin B9 and 135.4 times more Vitamin E than Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta.
- While 1 lb of Cooked Whole Grain Pasta, 51% Whole Wheat, Remaining Unenriched Semolina contains 1.9 times more Vitamin B1, 2 times more Vitamin B3, 2 times more Vitamin B5 and 2.7 times more Vitamin B6 than Almond paste.
- 1 pound of Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta have insufficient amounts of Vitamin E
Comparing minerals per 1 pound for Almond paste vs Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta:
- 1 pound of Almond paste has 14.3 times more Calcium, 2.3 times more Copper, 2.9 times more Magnesium, 2.3 times more Phosphorus, 4.1 times more Potassium and 1.3 times more Zinc than Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta.
- While 1 lb of Cooked Whole Grain Pasta, 51% Whole Wheat, Remaining Unenriched Semolina contains 8.1 times more Selenium than Almond paste.
- Both Almond paste and Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta contain similar levels of Iron and Manganese per one pound.
- 1 pound of Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 1 pound:
- 1 pound of Almond paste has 2.9 times more Energy, 18.5 times more Fat, 11 times more Saturated Fat, 5.1 times more Omega 3, 10.2 times more Omega 6, 1.5 times more Carbohydrate, 42.6 times more Sugars and 1.5 times more Protein than Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta.
- Both Almond paste and Cooked 51% Whole Wheat Pasta offer comparable quantities of Fiber per one pound.