Nutrient Comparison: Cooked Tahitian Taro VS Almond paste per 1 lb
Compare the macro and micronutrient content in 1 lb of Cooked Tahitian Taro versus 1 lb of Almond paste to make informed dietary choices. Explore their nutritional differences and benefits.
Lets compare vitamin content per 1 pound of Cooked Tahitian Taro vs Almond paste:
- 1 pound of Cooked Tahitian Taro has more Vitamin A, 3.3 times more Vitamin B6 and 380 times more Vitamin C than Almond paste.
- While 1 lb of Almond paste contains 1.9 times more Vitamin B1, 2.1 times more Vitamin B2, 3 times more Vitamin B3 and 10.4 times more Vitamin B9 than Cooked Tahitian Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Tahitian Taro and Almond paste provide similar amounts of Vitamin B5 per one pound.
- 1 pound of Cooked Tahitian Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
- 1 pound of Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A and Vitamin C
- Both Cooked Tahitian Taro no Salt as well as Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in one pound.
Comparing minerals per 1 pound for Cooked Tahitian Taro vs Almond paste:
- 1 pound of Cooked Tahitian Taro has 2 times more Potassium, 6 times more Sodium and 6.1 times more Water than Almond paste.
- While 1 lb of Almond paste contains 6 times more Copper, 2.5 times more Magnesium, 5.1 times more Manganese, 3.9 times more Phosphorus, 5.3 times more Selenium and 14.8 times more Zinc than Cooked Tahitian Taro no Salt.
- Both Cooked Tahitian Taro and Almond paste contain similar levels of Calcium and Iron per one pound.
- 1 pound of Cooked Tahitian Taro lack sufficient amounts of Selenium and Zinc
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 1 pound:
- 1 lb of Almond paste contains 10.4 times more Energy, 40.8 times more Fat, 18.9 times more Saturated Fat, 2.3 times more Omega 3, 28.4 times more Omega 6, 7 times more Carbohydrate and 2.2 times more Protein than Cooked Tahitian Taro no Salt.
- 1 pound of Cooked Tahitian Taro provide inadequate amounts of Energy and Omega 6