Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Almond pasteVS Chinese Waterchestnuts
Weight per 300 calories
Almond paste
65.5g
Chinese Waterchestnuts
309g
Almond paste has 4.7 times more energy per 100g than Chinese Waterchestnuts. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Almond paste or Chinese Waterchestnuts?
Almond Paste VS Chinese Waterchestnuts Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Almond paste or Chinese Waterchestnuts?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Almond paste vs Chinese Waterchestnuts:
300 calories of Almond paste have 2.4 times more Vitamin E than Chinese Waterchestnuts.
While 300 kcal of Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts contain 8.1 times more Vitamin B1, 2.3 times more Vitamin B2, 3.3 times more Vitamin B3, 20 times more Vitamin B5, 43 times more Vitamin B6 and 188.9 times more Vitamin C than Almond paste.
Both Almond paste and Chinese Waterchestnuts provide similar amounts of Vitamin B9 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Almond paste have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B1, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5, Vitamin B6 and Vitamin C
Both Almond paste as well as Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Almond paste vs Chinese Waterchestnuts:
300 calories of Almond paste have 3.3 times more Calcium, 5.6 times more Iron and 1.3 times more Magnesium than Chinese Waterchestnuts.
While 300 kcal of Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts contain 3.4 times more Copper, 1.8 times more Manganese, 8.8 times more Potassium, 1.6 times more Zinc and 24.6 times more Water than Almond paste.
Both Almond paste and Chinese Waterchestnuts contain similar levels of Phosphorus per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Iron
Both Almond paste as well as Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Almond paste have 58.8 times more Fat, 4.2 times more Omega 3, 36.9 times more Omega 6, 1.6 times more Sugars and 1.4 times more Protein than Chinese Waterchestnuts.
While 300 kcal of Raw Chinese Waterchestnuts contain 2.4 times more Carbohydrate and 3 times more Fiber than Almond paste.
Both Almond paste and Chinese Waterchestnuts offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Chinese Waterchestnuts provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6