Navel Oranges VS Apricot Nectar, Canned, With Added Ascorbic Acid Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Navel Oranges or Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Navel Oranges vs Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid:
- 300 calories of Navel Oranges have 1.3 times more Vitamin B1, 3.9 times more Vitamin B2, 3.2 times more Vitamin B3, 7.5 times more Vitamin B5, 2.4 times more Vitamin B6, 38.9 times more Vitamin B9 and 2.3 times more Vitamin C than Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid.
- While 300 kcal of Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid contain 2.4 times more Vitamin E than Raw Navel Oranges.
- Both Navel Oranges and Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid provide similar amounts of Vitamin A per 300 calories.
- 300 calories of Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B3, Vitamin B5 and Vitamin B9
- Both Raw Navel Oranges as well as Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12, Vitamin D and Vitamin K in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Navel Oranges vs Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid:
- 300 calories of Navel Oranges have 4.5 times more Calcium, 2.3 times more Copper, 1.5 times more Iron, 2.5 times more Magnesium, 1.8 times more Manganese, 5.3 times more Phosphorus and 2.8 times more Potassium than Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid.
- Both Navel Oranges and Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid contain similar levels of Water per 300 calories.
- 300 calories of Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Manganese and Phosphorus
- Both Raw Navel Oranges as well as Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid lack sufficient amounts of Selenium and Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
- 300 calories of Navel Oranges have 25.1 times more Fiber and 6.1 times more Protein than Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid.
- While 300 kcal of Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid contain 1.3 times more Sugars and 1.7 times more Fructose than Raw Navel Oranges.
- Both Navel Oranges and Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.
- 300 calories of Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein
- Both Raw Navel Oranges as well as Apricot nectar, canned, with added ascorbic acid provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 300 calories.