Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Navel OrangesVS Cooked Kamut
Weight per 300 calories
Navel Oranges
612g
Cooked Kamut
227g
Cooked Khorasan Wheat has 2.7 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Navel Oranges, which is average in comparison to other foods. Navel Oranges having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Navel Oranges or Cooked Kamut?
Navel Oranges VS Cooked Kamut Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Navel Oranges or Cooked Kamut?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Navel Oranges vs Cooked Kamut:
300 calories of Navel Oranges have 1.9 times more Vitamin B1, 4.6 times more Vitamin B2, 3 times more Vitamin B6, 8.3 times more Vitamin B9 and 1.7 times more Vitamin E than Cooked Kamut.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Khorasan Wheat contain 2 times more Vitamin B3 than Raw Navel Oranges.
300 calories of Cooked Kamut have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2 and Vitamin E
Both Raw Navel Oranges as well as Cooked Khorasan Wheat have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Navel Oranges vs Cooked Kamut:
300 calories of Navel Oranges have 12.9 times more Calcium, 2.7 times more Potassium and 3.6 times more Water than Cooked Kamut.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Khorasan Wheat contain 2 times more Copper, 5 times more Iron, 1.6 times more Magnesium, 13.2 times more Manganese, 2.4 times more Phosphorus, more Selenium and 8.5 times more Zinc than Raw Navel Oranges.
300 calories of Navel Oranges lack sufficient amounts of Selenium and Zinc
300 calories of Cooked Kamut lack sufficient amounts of Calcium
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Navel Oranges have 1.2 times more Carbohydrate, 7.5 times more Sugars and 1.4 times more Fiber than Cooked Kamut.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Khorasan Wheat contain 2.3 times more Protein than Raw Navel Oranges.
Both Navel Oranges and Cooked Kamut offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.