Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Potato SkinVS Cooked Taro
Weight per 300 calories
Potato Skin
517g
Cooked Taro
211g
Cooked Taro no Salt has 2.4 times more energy per unit of mass than Raw Potato Skin, which is average in comparison to other foods. Potato Skin having low energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Potato Skin or Cooked Taro?
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Potato Skin or Cooked Taro?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Potato Skin vs Cooked Taro:
300 calories of Potato Skin have 3.3 times more Vitamin B2, 5 times more Vitamin B3, 2.2 times more Vitamin B5, 1.8 times more Vitamin B6, 2.2 times more Vitamin B9 and 5.6 times more Vitamin C than Cooked Taro.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Taro no Salt contain 2.1 times more Vitamin B1 than Raw Potato Skin.
300 calories of Cooked Taro have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B2
Both Raw Potato Skin as well as Cooked Taro no Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Potato Skin vs Cooked Taro:
300 calories of Potato Skin have 4.1 times more Calcium, 5.2 times more Copper, 11 times more Iron, 1.9 times more Magnesium, 3.3 times more Manganese, 1.2 times more Phosphorus, 2.1 times more Potassium, 3.2 times more Zinc and 3.2 times more Water than Cooked Taro.
300 calories of Cooked Taro lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc
Both Raw Potato Skin as well as Cooked Taro no Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Potato Skin have 1.2 times more Fiber and 12.1 times more Protein than Cooked Taro.
Both Potato Skin and Cooked Taro offer comparable quantities of Energy and Carbohydrate per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Taro provide inadequate amounts of Protein
Both Raw Potato Skin as well as Cooked Taro no Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 300 calories.