Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Composite Household Vegetable ShorteningVS Commercial French Salad Dressing
Weight per 300 calories
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening
34g
Commercial French Salad Dressing
71.6g
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening has 2.1 times more energy per 100g than Commercial French Salad Dressing. It has very high energy density when compared to other foods. Commercial French Salad Dressing having very high energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Commercial French Salad Dressing?
Composite Household Vegetable Shortening VS Commercial French Salad Dressing Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Composite Household Vegetable Shortening or Commercial French Salad Dressing?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Commercial French Salad Dressing:
300 kcal of Commercial French Salad Dressing contain 1.7 times more Vitamin E and 4.8 times more Vitamin K than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Commercial French Salad Dressing have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B1, Vitamin B2, Vitamin B3, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B9, Vitamin B12, Vitamin C and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Composite Household Vegetable Shortening vs Commercial French Salad Dressing:
300 kcal of Commercial French Salad Dressing contain 348.6 times more Sodium than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Commercial French Salad Dressing lack sufficient amounts of Calcium, Copper, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Phosphorus, Potassium, Selenium and Zinc in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening have 1.2 times more Fat and 1.9 times more Saturated Fat than Commercial French Salad Dressing.
While 300 kcal of Commercial French Salad Dressing contain 3.2 times more Omega 3, 1.6 times more Omega 6, more Carbohydrate and more Sugars than Composite Household Vegetable Shortening.
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening and Commercial French Salad Dressing offer comparable quantities of Energy per 300 calories.
300 calories of Composite Household Vegetable Shortening provide inadequate amounts of Carbohydrate
Both Composite Household Vegetable Shortening as well as Commercial French Salad Dressing provide inadequate amounts of Fiber and Protein in 300 calories.