Comparing Nutrients in 300 calories Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with SaltVS Cooked Taro with Salt
Weight per 300 calories
Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
395g
Cooked Taro with Salt
211g
Cooked Taro with Salt has 1.9 times more energy per unit of mass than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt, which is average in comparison to other foods. Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt having average energy density.
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt or Cooked Taro with Salt?
Macros Ratio
ProteinFatCarbs
Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt
Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin With Salt VS Cooked Taro With Salt Nutrients Per 300 Kcal
Discover which food has more nutrients per 300 calories - Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt or Cooked Taro with Salt?
Lets compare vitamin content per 300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt vs Cooked Taro with Salt:
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt have 367.6 times more Vitamin A, 3.1 times more Vitamin B2, 2 times more Vitamin B3, 3.2 times more Vitamin B5, 4.8 times more Vitamin C and 3.3 times more Vitamin K than Cooked Taro with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Taro with Salt contain 1.7 times more Vitamin B9 and 1.7 times more Vitamin E than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt.
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt and Cooked Taro with Salt provide similar amounts of Vitamin B1 and Vitamin B6 per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B9
300 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin A, Vitamin B2 and Vitamin K
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt as well as Cooked Taro with Salt have insufficient amounts of Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in 300 calories.
Comparing minerals per 300 calories for Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt vs Cooked Taro with Salt:
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt have 2.8 times more Calcium, 1.9 times more Iron, 2 times more Sodium, 1.4 times more Zinc and 2.3 times more Water than Cooked Taro with Salt.
While 300 kcal of Cooked Taro with Salt contain 1.3 times more Phosphorus than Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt.
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt and Cooked Taro with Salt contain similar levels of Copper, Magnesium, Manganese and Potassium per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Calcium and Zinc
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt as well as Cooked Taro with Salt lack sufficient amounts of Selenium in 300 calories.
Comparison of macro-nutrients per 300 calories:
300 calories of Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt have 21.9 times more Sugars and 4.9 times more Protein than Cooked Taro with Salt.
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt and Cooked Taro with Salt offer comparable quantities of Energy, Carbohydrate and Fiber per 300 calories.
300 calories of Cooked Taro with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Protein
Both Cooked Sweet Potato, Boiled, Without Skin with Salt as well as Cooked Taro with Salt provide inadequate amounts of Omega 3 and Omega 6 in 300 calories.